高级搜索
赵琳娜, 姚梦颖, 巩远发, 慕秀香, 李依瞳, 安建宇. 2020: 基于贝叶斯模型平均法的“利奇马”台风暴雨预报订正研究. 暴雨灾害, 39(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.05.003
引用本文: 赵琳娜, 姚梦颖, 巩远发, 慕秀香, 李依瞳, 安建宇. 2020: 基于贝叶斯模型平均法的“利奇马”台风暴雨预报订正研究. 暴雨灾害, 39(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.05.003
ZHAO Linna, YAO Mengying, GONG Yuanfa, MU Xiuxiang, LI Yitong, AN Jianyu. 2020: Calibration of prediction for rainstorm event caused by typhoon Lekima based on Bayesian Model Averaging. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 39(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.05.003
Citation: ZHAO Linna, YAO Mengying, GONG Yuanfa, MU Xiuxiang, LI Yitong, AN Jianyu. 2020: Calibration of prediction for rainstorm event caused by typhoon Lekima based on Bayesian Model Averaging. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 39(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.05.003

基于贝叶斯模型平均法的“利奇马”台风暴雨预报订正研究

Calibration of prediction for rainstorm event caused by typhoon Lekima based on Bayesian Model Averaging

  • 摘要: 利用2019年7月1日—8月12日欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)集合预报产品与同时段逐6 h地面降水观测资料,采用贝叶斯模型平均法,建立了ECMWF降水集合预报的BMA模型(简称BMA模型),并对BMA模型的“利奇马”台风降水的确定性预报和概率预报与ECMWF原始集合预报进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)总体上,BMA模型对台风降水集合预报有较好的订正效果,能有效改善预报的离散度。(2)与原始集合预报相比,BMA模型的连续等级概率评分(CRPS)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)的平均值分别降低了13%、34%和25%,在一定程度上提高了预报的可靠性,但随着降水量级增大,提高程度逐渐减弱;BMA模型还在一定程度上降低了原始集合预报对暴雨及以上量级降水预报概率的虚报,提高了“利奇马”台风暴雨及以上量级降水落区预报的准确性。(3)在该个例中第25百分位至第95百分位可视为有效预报区间,经BMA模型订正后的有效预报区间对降水观测的捕捉能力更强,BMA模型订正后的ECMWF集合预报捕获率比原始集合预报提高13.3%。

     

    Abstract: Using the products of European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble prediction and rain gauge data with interval of 6 hours from July 1 to August12 in 2019, we have established a precipitation probability forecast model (hereinafter referred to as the BMA model) based on Bayesian Model Average, and then conducted a comparative analysis of the deterministic forecast and probability forecast of typhoon Lekima precipitation based on the BMA model with respect to the raw ensemble forecast of ECMWF. The main results are as follow. (1) In general, the BMA model has a good correction to the typhoon precipitation ensemble prediction, and it can improve the dispersion of ensemble prediction effectively. (2) Compared with the raw ensemble forecast, the averaged values of CRPS, MAE and RMSE of the BMA model were reduced by 13%, 34% and 25%, respectively, which improved the reliability of the forecast to some extent. However, the improvement degree gradually weakened as the precipitation grade increased. The BMA model can also reduce the false alarm of probability prediction of rainstorm and heavier precipitation to a certain extent. It can also improve the accuracy of typhoon Lekima rainstorm and heavier precipitation' s area forecast. (3) In this case, the 25th percentile to the 95th percentile forecast can be regarded as an effective prediction interval. The effective prediction interval revised by the BMA model has a stronger ability to capture precipitation observations, and the ensemble forecast capture rate revised by the BMA model is 13.3% higher than that of raw ensemble forecast.

     

/

返回文章
返回