高级搜索
王明, 陈英英, 周毓荃, 李琦. 2022: 基于一次暴雨过程的风云四号A星三种云参数应用效果对比分析. 暴雨灾害, 41(4): 396-404. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2022.04.004
引用本文: 王明, 陈英英, 周毓荃, 李琦. 2022: 基于一次暴雨过程的风云四号A星三种云参数应用效果对比分析. 暴雨灾害, 41(4): 396-404. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2022.04.004
WANG Ming, CHEN Yingying, ZHOU Yuquan, LI Qi. 2022: Comparative analysis of application effects of three cloud parameters of FY-4A in a rainstorm case. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 41(4): 396-404. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2022.04.004
Citation: WANG Ming, CHEN Yingying, ZHOU Yuquan, LI Qi. 2022: Comparative analysis of application effects of three cloud parameters of FY-4A in a rainstorm case. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 41(4): 396-404. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2022.04.004

基于一次暴雨过程的风云四号A星三种云参数应用效果对比分析

Comparative analysis of application effects of three cloud parameters of FY-4A in a rainstorm case

  • 摘要: 云宏微观物理特征参数(简称“云参数”)是云和降水分析的重要依据,针对2020年6月27日发生在湖北的一次极端暴雨过程,选取风云四号A星(FY-4A)三个波段的原始数据及三种云参数产品与时空匹配的中分辨光谱成像仪(moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer,MODIS)资料进行对比,结果表明:(1)相比MODIS的窄光谱,FY-4A卫星光谱响应函数的波段普遍较宽,二者在三个通道中心波段的位置上均存在一定的偏移。(2)从原始数据来看,两颗卫星平面分布模态较为一致,FY-4A可见光波段反射率总体上小于MODIS,相关系数为0.91,平均偏差为-0.07;FY-4A近红外波段反射率比MODIS偏大近40%,平均偏差为0.05,相关系数仅为0.42;FY-4A红外波段亮温略高于MODIS,平均偏差为3.7K,相关系数达0.93、线性拟合斜率接近1。(3)从云参数产品来看,FY-4A反演的云光学厚度(Cloud Optical Thickness,COT)小于MODIS,深厚密闭的云区差异明显,但相关性较好、二者的拟合呈非线性;与MODIS相比,FY-4A反演的云粒子有效半径(Cloud Effective Radius,CER)区间较窄,云顶温度(Cloud Top Temperature,CTT)略偏高、相关性最好。(4)随着雨强的增大,两颗卫星反演的COT、CER的偏差增大,CTT的偏差减小。

     

    Abstract: The parameters of cloud macro-and microphysical characteristics (referred to as "cloud parameters") are important basis for cloud and precipitation analysis. Aiming at an extreme rainstorm event that occurred in Hubei province on June 27, 2020, the original data of three band and three cloud parameter products of FY-4A were selected to compare with spatio-temporally coincident MODIS data. The results show that: (1) Compared with the narrow spectrum of MODIS, the spectral response function of the FY-4A satellite generally has a wider band. At the center band of the three channels, there is a certain offset in position between the two. (2) Judging from the original data, the plane distribution modes of the two satellites are relatively consistent. The reflectivity of FY-4A in the visible band is generally lower than that of MODIS, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91 and an average deviation of-0.07. The reflectivity of FY-4A in the near-infrared band is nearly 40% larger than MODIS, with an average deviation of 0.05 and a correlation coefficient of only 0.42. The brightness temperature of the FY-4A infrared band is slightly higher than that of MODIS, with an average deviation of 3.7 K, a correlation coefficient of 0.93, and a linear fitting slope close to 1. (3) From the perspective of cloud parameter products, the Cloud Optical Thickness (COT) of FY-4A retrival is smaller than that of MODIS, and the deep closed cloud area has an obvious difference, but the correlation is good, and the fitting of the two is nonlinear. Compared with MODIS, Cloud Effective Radius (CER) obtained by FY-4A retrival is narrower, Cloud Top Temperature (CTT) is slightly higher, and the correlation is the best. (4) With the increase of rain intensity, the deviation of COT and CER retrieved by the two satellites increases, and the deviation of CTT decreases.

     

/

返回文章
返回